Posted on 01/27/2022 5:07:01 AM PST by Kaslin
We’ve long been familiar with media bias, where the opinions of those who own or produce news make their way into the stories they tell and even the choices of which stories are worth telling.
But in recent years, there’s been a new kind of journalism that deserves more scrutiny – when publications produce stories for the express purpose of achieving certain results.
In the case of Donald Trump, it was used to start the Russia collusion debacle and attempt to ruin him politically. But the tactic has more commercial uses as well.
In Washington, a publication known as the Capitol Forum seems to be set up to weaponize the press against certain companies. Many of its “journalists” are activists, and the sometimes-misleading stories from the pricey boutique publication, whose subscribers are mainly Wall Street financial firms and prominent law firms, have led to big losses for corporate shareholders and significant short-selling campaigns against targets of the stories.
In 2017, Capitol Forum published a story that said MiMedx, a biopharmaceutical company, was under investigation by the Veterans Administration’s Office of Inspector General. The publication cited documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
MiMedx officials said they were aware of the investigation, which dealt with “channel-stuffing” – the practice by some companies to ship more goods to suppliers than would be demanded to show strong sales – but were not its targets. The VA said it had not disclosed who it was investigating, which means it well could’ve been some other firm.
Rather than wait for solid developments or even express the uncertainty inherent in its claim, Capital Forum’s director of sales emailed all the major investors in MiMedx to say the VA inspector general was investigating the firm. It then sought documents to try to show the firm was being investigated. When the inspector general turned down the request, Capital Forum used that as ammo for another email to top investors – offering to set up a call to “discuss” its “view on MiMedx.”
On that news, the firm lost 20 percent of its share value.
Then there’s Stamps.com, a firm that participates in the U.S. Postal Service’s Postage Reseller Program, which allows companies to resell Postal Service products and services at lower prices. In 2019, Capitol Forum wrote a few stories about Stamps.com and its relationship with the Postal Service. It then made a point of making additional Freedom of Information requests about the reseller program and noisily took the Postal Service to court when its requests were denied.
The activity – erstwhile journalism organization seeking info Postal Service refuses to produce about firm it “suspects” of having a too-cozy relationship with USPS – was enough. A short-seller named Marc Cohodes tweeted: “STMP is a scheme and I think the Insider Selling is the Frosting on the Cheesecake.”
This set off a short-selling campaign that involved a quarter of the firm’s shares and drove the price down to $40 per share in May 2019. By September 2021, Capitol Forum had moved on, and shares were selling for $326.
It’s one thing to engage in tactics to force short selling. The companies at least can find out and try to repair their image. But it’s another when its work is used to bring to bear the force of law. Law firms are a big part of Capitol Forum’s client base, and they use it both to seek new clients and for evidence in their existing cases.
Fleetcor, an Atlanta-based company that manages gas credit card programs for BP, Shell and Speedway, among others, is under fire now from the Federal Trade Commission for charging customers “hundreds of millions of dollars in mystery fees associated with fuel cards.”
Fighting the charges has been a struggle. The case went to the Supreme Court, which threw it out because the Federal Trade Commission had cited the wrong section of law in its original suit. But the FTC refiled the case, and the principal source of evidence in its complaint is Capitol Forum.
We know now – if we didn’t before – that there’s no such thing as unbiased journalism. We also know outfits that seek to do journalism right generally hire journalists to write their stories. At Capitol Forum, many of the journalists are activists settling scores from former positions. It has Steve Horn, a writer with DeSmog Blog, an anti-oil website. It has Lisa Epstein, a well-known anti-Wall Street activist, on business, and Dan Sherwood, another anti-oil & gas activist, working on environmental issues.
The First Amendment guarantees the right to say what we want. Discerning consumers can do what they will with the information. However, when journalism seeks to torpedo firms the publication doesn’t like, the truth is a likely casualty.
This is fraud, not journalism.The world has gone mad.
AP stands for Agitation and Propaganda.
That is what passes for “journalism” these days.
Used car salesmen have more integrity.
Believe NOTHING the media tells you! If they say it is raining, call in the dog and see if he is wet.
They suffer no consequences. Why would they change?
This is why we need to get rid of The NY Times v. Sullivan standard in defamation cases. It is a license for the media to defame with no consequences.
We don’t have journalism, we have a Ministry of Propaganda.
Just this morning I was watching FBN with my wife. Maria was doing her usual good work trying to shine a light on the invasion at the southern border, encouraged by the White House.
I told my wife, doesn’t matter. Both political parties want an open border, and anyone that doesn’t watch the few conservative outlets, won’t have any idea we’re being invaded. In fact, if you mention the invasion to a msm consumer, they’ll simply dismiss it and say: “Where did you hear that, FOX?!”
Just one of the many reasons I hate the media in a way that I cannot adequately express.
Nobody in my neck of the woods (NJ) would ever question the invasion; even leftists find themselves awash in Thirdworlders jabbering in tongues. They have to shut up about it in public (to maintain an air of progressiveness), but they flee from the areas they overrun just the same.
Both parties do want an open border, for labor, consumers, and a NEXT GENERATION; it is incredible how quickly this country is changing demographically, and just as incredible how Americans choose to ignore it.
” ... it is incredible how quickly this country is changing demographically, and just as incredible how Americans choose to ignore it.”
It’s the darnedest thing I’ve ever witnessed. A huge number of Americans aren’t upset because their TV hasn’t told them to be upset. And yes, there are the Dems who approve of the invasion simply because that’s what their “team” wants. It enrages me that progressives who have the means, pick up and move away from the disasters they create. One day soon, it will take a LOT of money to escape the mess.
I believe Ann Coulter referenced that when she said they trash our neighborhoods while they retreat to idyllic settings that resemble 1950s America.
I was reading about the “Peanuts” strip, and it was noted that Franklin was added in the 1960s at the behest of a fan/reader. I’m not sure where the characters were supposed to live (they had cold enough winters to freeze ponds), but it is understandable that he’d appear. While we did have Asians and Hispanics in the US at the time, they were more of a regional presence; today they’d make up more than half of their class almost regardless of where the strip was set.
Both parties do want an open border, for labor, consumers, and a NEXT GENERATION; it is incredible how quickly this country is changing demographically, and just as incredible how Americans choose to ignore it.
I’ve thought about this myself. Dems want Marxism and are happy to welcome allies. On the right you have some shut ins and elderly who do not get out and just have no clue how the country is now. Then you have GOP voters who are in denial and do not want to face the reality that the political party they supported for a lifetime in fact hates them and wants to replace them with more pliable third world dirt farmers.
Every day patriots die and more big government loving third worlders arrive. This is not a battle we are winning. The Uniparty knows that and are playing a long game that will move the entire electorate to the left. Soon our only “choice” will be a Romney type republican and a hard core Marxist.
Right.
Years ago I was warning Americans that assumed “other Americans will have the children” that they were WRONG - and now it has played out in front of our very eyes.
I think that pretty much sums it up. I watch some local news and there aren't any reports that conflict with official covid narrative.
AP stands for Agitation and Propaganda.
I preferred Always Prevaricating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.