Replies

> You literally cannot keep your lies straight. When you said "I have to admit that it does look suspicious", you were knew you were commenting from watching the entirety of all the SoS-released State Farm Arena video, because that was the subject matter of the very thread in which you posted!

What I actually said was, "I have to admit that it does look suspicious, but I’m not ready to convict." You have a tendency to take snippets of things I have posted out of context. It is a bit like what Giuliani and the rest Trump's legal time did with the security cam video at State Farm.

As far as your assertion that I'm a liar, I can tell you that I have never lied about any of these matters regarding the election. So far you have not caught me in a single lie. And you won't, because I haven't lied. I only became aware that the GA SoS had made public many hours of the security video when Gabe Sterling announced this during his (factually correct, as far as I can ascertain) press conference on Jan. 4th. You should know this because you apparently have gone through my entire posting history. In any case, here's what I wrote on Jan. 1 at 3:09:34 AM on that same thread:

I would also like to see the full security video released. Trump’s lawyers have had it for almost a month. Why not release it to the public so we can see it in its entirety? We can then see for our own eyes when the ballots were placed under the table and by whom? The question about the chain of custody of the ballots came up during the Dec 3rd GA Judiciary Subcommittee meeting and at the time Traci Picks claimed they hadn’t had enough time to make the determination (which I don’t believe.) They’ve had plenty of time now, so why don’t we know yet? Why haven’t we seen the full video? The GA SoS investigator claims that the ballots were placed under the table around 10pm with the state monitor, media and election observers present. If that’s not the case, then why don’t the Trump lawyers refute this with footage from the security video?

Also, on Jan. 3rd at 4:38:28PM, in response to a poster asking if I had seen the video of the alleged multiple scanning of ballots, I posted the following:

Yes, I did. I admit that looks suspicious, but I’m not ready to convict. But for the sake of argument let’s say each of the two ladies scanned their stack four times (if they had done more Trump’s team would have certainly pointed it out) and all those votes went to Biden. Given the time it took to scan (and the max rate of the Dominion machines — 3000 ballots/hr I believe) this would have been at most a few hundred notes. Definitely not enough to swing the note. In any case, I’d like to see the entire video so I can see whether that behavior was really out of the ordinary or not.

It should be clear from this that I had not seen the many hours of video that was (at some point on or before Jan. 4th) released by the GA SoS at that time that I wrote, "I have to admit that it does look suspicious, but I’m not ready to convict" on Dec. 31st.

> Imagine that, Bob Cheeley called it like it is, and there you were to back him up, "I have to admit that it does look suspicious".

See how you take what I say out of context to score points? It is really not very honest, is it? We are not politicians (at least I'm not.) There's no reason we need to engage in this sort of dishonesty just because we don't agree with one another.

The GA Senate "hearings" on the election (especially the second one) seemed to me to be little more than televised shows in front an almost entirely friendly audience of GA state legislators where Trump's legal team could put forth misinformation with essentially no push back. Bob Cheeley's presentation was, in my opinion, ridiculous -- as bad, if not worse, than the presentation Tracy Pick gave in the first "hearing."