Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: whitney69
I hope that takes care of the simple request as by not going into the virus, it should be easier to understand my stance. It is political, not medical.

well then that explains a lot.

A bureaucrat isn't required to think, just do your job and collect your money.

If they told you to kill the Joker for coming in and he broke the no vax rule, he is illegal, a danger to our society and then... off he goes, right?

It's all going to work itself out and you might want to think about "rules are rules" and "I was just following orders" excuse.

I just like the fact that the veil has been lifted and the face of the totalitarian, the face of the support for the totalitarian and all those that believe in the collective over the individual are out in the open to see.

If you somehow think that being the good little bureaucrat will protect you and your family, it won't. All these totalitarian regimes and dictators follow a similar path.

You will eventually be asked to chose between your family and the state..... if I were you, i'd chose the state.

I would do the same thing. I'd be the bestest little nazi anyone has ever seen.

92 posted on 01/16/2022 6:35:41 PM PST by Dick Vomer (2 Timothy 4:7 deo duce ferro comitantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Dick Vomer

January 13, 2022 - The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the federal government can enforce a final rule mandating healthcare workers to be vaccinated against COVID-19 while cases challenging the mandate are being appealed.

In a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court agreed that the final rule mandating the vaccine for healthcare workers in facilities participating in Medicare and/or Medicaid “fits neatly within” the authority Congress has granted to HHS to impose conditions on federal funds.

“After all, ensuring that providers take steps to avoid transmitting a dangerous virus to their patients is consistent with the fundamental principle of the medical profession: first, do no harm,” an opinion released alongside the decision stated. “It would be the ‘very opposite of efficient and effective administration for a facility that is supposed to make people well to make them sick with COVID–19.’”

AMA RESPONDS TO SUPREME COURT RULING

The American Medical Association (AMA) released a statement Thursday on the Supreme Court’s ruling. The statement says:
“While the American Medical Association (AMA) is pleased by today’s opinion allowing the Center for Medicare and Medicaid’s (CMS) interim rule requiring COVID-19 vaccines for health care workers to take effect, we are deeply disappointed that the Court blocked the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) emergency temporary standard for COVID-19 vaccination and testing for large businesses from moving forward.

Workplace transmission has been a major factor in the spread of COVID-19. Now more than ever, workers in all settings across the country need commonsense, evidence-based protections against COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death — particularly those who are immunocompromised or cannot get vaccinated due to a medical condition. In fact, recent data released by United Airlines shows that before their own vaccine requirement went into effect, on average, more than one United employee was dying each week from the virus; however, today, none of their vaccinated workers are currently hospitalized with COVID-19 despite breakthrough infections and 3,000 current positive employees.”

https://revcycleintelligence.com/news/supreme-court-oks-vaccine-mandate-for-healthcare-workers

If this is such a positive answer for the AMA, then why did it have to go to court? Could it be that they have their own bureaucracy and are not trying to conform to the government policies and laws until they are forced through the courts starting last May?

Shoe fits both groups. Is it the case of the medical practitioners not wishing to follow their IOM’s? If it has been determined by the medical field, name Fauci, ring a bell, that vaccines are a way of stopping the virus, and the courts are backing this thought, then why are practitioners taking it to court. It’s no different than Djokovic at that point in that it undermines the effort to vaccinate by what the laws are. And the medical people are fighting it enough to require the SCOTUS to rule.

And as for killing someone:

“If they told you to kill the Joker for coming in and he broke the no vax rule, he is illegal, a danger to our society and then... off he goes, right?”

Then maybe you can explain the process of abortion, to include late term, so it doesn’t match up with what you just wrote. Something about Roe vs. Wade?

Wy69


94 posted on 01/16/2022 8:20:28 PM PST by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson