Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: naturalman1975

When he issued the previous decision Judge Kelly lectured the government lawyer to notify him immediately if Hawke was going to take any action. I’m thinking he might not be too happy to have to spend his weekend on this after Hawke’s juvenile stunt of waiting until Friday evening. And why didn’t Hawke give some more substantive ground for his action? I think he expects and maybe wants to be overruled, and he did this 100% for political reasons.


22 posted on 01/14/2022 12:20:01 AM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: devere
And why didn’t Hawke give some more substantive ground for his action?

He's not really supposed to. His personal power to overrule under the act is meant to be done only on very simple grounds. Overcomplicating would not be appropriate.

I think he expects and maybe wants to be overruled, and he did this 100% for political reasons.

He's a politician, so I wouldn't rule anything out. Like I say, it's going to be interesting to see what happens next.

25 posted on 01/14/2022 12:23:40 AM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson