You keep saying that and it is complete BS. I don’t know what your agenda is , unless you are just an ongoing vax $hill. These two treatments were known early on, mentioning that in this document absolutely does NOT indicate it’s a forgery.
My point was, the efficacy of ivermectin and HCQ were “known” only to the dissident community, they weren’t “known” to people who do this kind of research (and they still aren’t).
The story that SARS CoV 2 was a vaccine candidate prepared in Wuhan with US funding is very plausible.
The purpose of including the incongruous information about IVM/HCQ, and no other antivirals, is bait to make what has happened with these documents happen - gobbled up by COVID dissidents, soon to be exposed as forgeries, and taking down the true stuff with the false.