To: SmokingJoe
Pfizer has been spreading money all around like a drunken sailor.
This court case is worth over a $100 billion dollars to them. They have manipulated data and such things for much less.
50 posted on
01/13/2022 6:44:23 AM PST by
redgolum
(If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
To: redgolum
I don't see how Pfizer and all the rest of the jab companies would be too badly hurt by a ruling against the mandates. They're just going to keep rolling out boosters ad infinitum with the Fed's funding, and enough sheeple baring their arms for them to continue raking in exorbitant profits. The majority of Americans will line up for those 'vaccines' like people on a hot, humid summer night for ice cream.
I would be pleasantly surprised if there's ever a really effective mass movement of Americans against these shots. Maybe it's just because I live on the Left Coast here and everyone I know is perturbed that I'm not seeking the "booster" or any more jabs for that matter. In La La Land people are breathlessly awaiting for the latest mandates from our county health director who calls the shots (pun intended).
57 posted on
01/13/2022 6:57:02 AM PST by
Deo volente
("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
To: All
Boom
Gorsuch:
But if this Court
were to abide them only in more tranquil conditions, declarations of emergencies would never end and the liberties
our Constitution’s separation of powers seeks to preserve
would amount to little.
To: redgolum
None of which means they’ve spread any money to the US Supreme Court like you were saying.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson