Posted on 01/11/2022 2:49:31 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Federal courts considering the Biden administration’s vaccination mandates—including the Supreme Court at Friday’s oral argument—have focused on administrative-law issues. The decrees raise constitutional issues as well. But there’s a simpler reason the justices should stay these mandates: the rise of the Omicron variant.
It would be irrational, legally indefensible and contrary to the public interest for government to mandate vaccines absent any evidence that the vaccines are effective in stopping the spread of the pathogen they target. Yet that’s exactly what’s happening here.
Both mandates—from the Health and Human Services Department for healthcare workers and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration for large employers in many other industries—were issued Nov. 5. At that time, the Delta variant represented almost all U.S. Covid-19 cases, and both agencies appropriately considered Delta at length and in detail, finding that the vaccines remained effective against it.
Those findings are now obsolete. As of Jan. 1, Omicron represented more than 95% of U.S. Covid cases, according to estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Because some of Omicron’s 50 mutations are known to evade antibody protection, because more than 30 of those mutations are to the spike protein used as an immunogen by the existing vaccines, and because there have been mass Omicron outbreaks in heavily vaccinated populations, scientists are highly uncertain the existing vaccines can stop it from spreading. As the CDC put it on Dec. 20, “we don’t yet know . . . how well available vaccines and medications work against it.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
As the World Health Organization puts it , “if mandatory vaccination is considered necessary to interrupt transmission chains and prevent harm to others, there should be sufficient evidence that the vaccine is efficacious in preventing serious infection and/or transmission.” For Omicron, there is as yet no such evidence.
The little data we have suggest the opposite. One preprint study found that after 30 days the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines no longer had any statistically significant positive effect against Omicron infection, and after 90 days, their effect went negative—i.e., vaccinated people were more susceptible to Omicron infection. Confirming this negative efficacy finding, data from Denmark and the Canadian province of Ontario indicate that vaccinated people have higher rates of Omicron infection than unvaccinated people.
Meantime, it has long been known that vaccinated people with breakthrough infections are highly contagious, and preliminary data from all over the world indicate that this is true of Omicron as well.As CDC Director Rochelle Walensky put it last summer, the viral load in the noses and throats of vaccinated people infected with Delta is “indistinguishable” from that of unvaccinated people, and “what [the vaccines] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”
“Those findings are now obsolete.”
This is why we don’t rely on the judiciary (or government bureaucrats) to make health decisions. By the time they get through the red tape, it’s usually far too late to have actually made the correct decision.
Even without Xi omicron there is no basis for a vaccine mandate.
This argument does not support oppositions to vaccine mandates.
I apologize for missing the space bar in the title.
It should read:
Nobel Prize in Medicine Winner Luc Montagnier: Omicron Makes Biden’s Vaccine Mandates Obsolete
Now for all those grammar teachers out there, remember that typos DO occur and FR does not have the feature for you to correct your typos.
The omicron variant is to the COVID-19 Wuhan virus, as cowpox was to the much dreaded and deadly smallpox. An attenuated form of the virus, not strong enough to be deadly in any significant way, but able to generate antibodies that effectively STOP the more deadly variants.
Polio was wiped out only after a form of “killed-virus” vaccine was made widely available. But I remember a time when every summer was a worrisome period for mothers of young children, and “iron lungs” were the last-ditch treatment.
What did not cause lifelong paralysis or death left individuals with stunted and weakened limbs, and a syndrome that showed up in the later decades of life.
Lol.. then rcery supreme court member and their immediate kin should be treated with 1905 remedies its just precedent.
Many of the decisions made by the SC are not only for the specific case being heard but for future possible cases to be avoided with precedence set.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.