Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: livius
I didn't look at the allegedly problematic provisions of the first law in any detail. However, I will say that judging a law by its intent, rather than by the actual language, is a common mistake. So, just because the first law had the right general idea does not necessarily mean it was a good law. Good laws can be sunk by poor drafting.

I don't care enough right now to grave dig that original law to see if there was actually a problem. But she is apparently pushing this one, so I'll wait until the dust settles to see if she was right.

25 posted on 01/10/2022 5:29:56 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

“I didn’t look at the allegedly problematic provisions of the first law in any detail. However, I will say that judging a law by its intent, rather than by the actual language, is a common mistake.”

I read some articles on it. It was carefully written to mimic laws in other states, by people who litigate this for a living. As to the courts, Trump left this country with very conservative Appellate Courts (at least outside of the solid blue areas), predicting a loss on this type of issue in those courts is simply a lie.


32 posted on 01/10/2022 6:28:21 AM PST by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson