If the NIH has acknowledged these as viable treatments, why are we still denied the use of them? Do you have links to proof that the NIH deemed them viable? My annual well-visit check up is in a few weeks and I would like to confront my doctor with this evidence. She most likely will just tow the line of the health system that all the docs in our county belong to, but perhaps it might be a beginning.
why still denied?
because they are cheap effective alternatives to the jabs and do not lead to a life-time of boosters
people will kill for $100. what do you think they’ll do for $100 billion?