I would love to see the double blind study showing invermectin’s effectiveness wwith at least 30,000 participants. Can you produce a PDF or a link to such a peer reviewed study? The Lancet would be acceptable or scidirect. If you cannot show at least one study that meets at least this your statement is just an personal opinion and a wrong one at that so produce at least one peer reviewed study backing your assertion. Antivirals all carry risks tamaflu carries similar risks with liver or advanced kidney disease.
You mean the same Lancet that had to retract other false peer reviewed studies and articles?
That Lancet?
If you cannot show at least one study that meets at least this your statement is just an personal opinion and a wrong one at that so produce at least one peer reviewed study backing your assertion.
Peer review is meaningless. It’s just the good old boys club patting each other on the back for publishing “evidence” supporting the leading narrative of the day.
Antivirals all carry risks tamaflu carries similar risks with liver or advanced kidney disease.
Are you confusing Ivermectin with an anti-viral? Do you really not know what it is and how it works?
Lancet and NEJM last year published fraudulent studies to attack hydroxychloroquine. Who except gullible fools believes them now? Maybe we should first look at the Journal of Irreproducible Results?
Personally I find the covid-Ivermectin whole population results in India and Africa entirely convincing https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/indias-ivermectin-blackout-—part-v-the-secret-revealed/article_9a37d9a8-1fb2-11ec-a94b-47343582647b.html https://citizenfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/ivermectin-africa.jpg.
