[Socon-Econ]

The later the supposed consequence, the less credible it is. The control period has to end sometime, but it will never last enough for the anti-vaxxers. If a health problem pops up, say, 5 years later, they’ll blame it on the vaccine.

[zeestephen]

Re: "If a health problem pops up, say, 5 years later, the anti-vaxxers will blame it on the vaccine.

Before Covid, the average new drug required nine years for development and testing in the USA.

[Boogieman]

“The control period has to end sometime, but it will never last enough for the anti-vaxxers.”

Did you call everyone who insisted on properly conducted long-term safety trials prior to 2020 an “anti-vaxxer”? Or is this just a recent habit of yours to slander people who insist on proper protocols being followed?

[Prince of Space]

I’m not an “anti-vaxxer.” I’m against a vaccine that was rushed through development and had an inadequate trial period; still hasn’t been approved by the FDA; and has absolutely no manufacturer liability.

If all of that isn’t enough to make someone nervous about getting the “vaccine,” how about that it doesn’t work as a vaccine should since you can still get sick and even die; the CDC and the media have lied to us about the virus and the vaccine every step of the way; and there’s no provision made for the over 150,000,000 Americans who have already had Covid and survived—which, according to “soyance,” means we are immune and don’t require an ineffective and possibly deadly experimental use authorization vaccine.

The fact that we are then lambasted and ridiculed by our fellow conservatives, merely because we value our right to have autonomy over our bodies, is especially irritating and downright scary. How about you “vaxxers” MYOFB. The “unclean” among you cannot hurt you because you got the mighty “vaccine,” right? 🤣