Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Manchin would have backed $1.8T version of Biden spending bill: report
NYPost ^ | 12/21/2021 | Mare Moore

Posted on 12/21/2021 9:22:00 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Seruzawa

I can’t believe the people of WVa keep falling for it.


21 posted on 12/21/2021 9:40:37 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

> I can’t believe how many freepers keep falling for Manchin’s BS. <

I think it’s just a case of “So far, so good.” I’m not about to send Manchin any campaign contributions, or even a Christmas card. But I will applaud him for what he’s done...so far.

He might go all wobbly tomorrow. But that’s true of most any politician.


22 posted on 12/21/2021 9:41:01 AM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It would be really sad if the senator backed anything like this bill. The bill was mostly a disaster to America and our economy. Better to just propose its few good or plausible spending projects (maybe a total of ten percent?) in a new bill and be done with it.


23 posted on 12/21/2021 9:43:23 AM PST by faithhopecharity (“Politicians are not born. They’re excreted.” Marcus Tillius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

Right - that was the GAO’s estimate and maybe that’s what Manchin is basing is rejection on vs what Biden “claims” it is?


24 posted on 12/21/2021 9:44:46 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

CBO has calculated Biden bill at OVER $ 4 Trillion cost.


25 posted on 12/21/2021 9:47:13 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

He might go all wobbly tomorrow.

….really, the reason everyone is excited about Manchin today is that he was the last Unknown vote.

Mitt Romney could change his mind and be the next In Demand Darling. Doesn’t make any of them heroes in my book.


26 posted on 12/21/2021 9:50:36 AM PST by drSteve78 (Je suis Deplorable. STILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano
Goodfellas - Don't buy anything!
27 posted on 12/21/2021 9:51:10 AM PST by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

.
It’s not about cost.

Ron Klain pissed of Manchin by portraying him as essentially acting and then folding - as his history. His Ego is hurt.

.


28 posted on 12/21/2021 9:52:02 AM PST by AnthonySoprano (‘’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This article is more fake news meant to smear Manchin so they can say he hates poor children.

There are things in this bill that are so far left that even Manchin cannot support them.


29 posted on 12/21/2021 9:52:29 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (We are being played by forces most do not understand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

He said recently he would be OK at $1.75mm, so close enough for govt work. I wouldn’t be surprised by a deal. Get Manchin on board for $1.8mm, do the rest with EO’s.


30 posted on 12/21/2021 10:05:39 AM PST by SaxxonWoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drSteve78

Just like that Tulsi chick that freepers keep creepin’ on. Just cause she looks good in a bathing suit.


31 posted on 12/21/2021 10:07:54 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: drSteve78

Maybe I have misunderstood Manchin’s position. I would certainly be totally against the climate change portion of it; not necessarily the portion Manchin was against. Can anybody say what else was in this bill that any sensible person would be unlikely to vote for? This seems to me a good example why proposed bills should include just ONE item. Who would want to vote for a bill that includes both good & bad items? If I would say that some of the misguided folks we have in Congress would do this, then I guess I just answered my own question. One bill, one item would put a stop to some of this & let the decision of each Congressperson be guided by the will of his/her constituents, not their own greediness.


32 posted on 12/21/2021 11:14:58 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

I thought I had read where Manchin’s refusal to sign this phony BBB bill was done on behalf of his cosntituents. If this is not the real reason then I would apologize & try harder to not make the same mistake twice.


33 posted on 12/21/2021 11:24:23 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson