Hogan will probably get monoclonal antibodies. Is he working to get enough of these for other Marylanders? They are made in a lab.
Emphasizing that I am not medically trained, please consider the following.
Given that you first need to get infected with a weakened virus to trigger healthy immune system response, why is MSM seemingly trying to demonize what is possibly nothing more than healthy immune system response?
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi: We already have antibody memory immunity to COVID19, 99% of us immune. Vaccination is unnecessary & re-vaccination potentially life threatening. (7.9.21)
On the other hand, given that Gov. Hogan is vaccinated, some medical experts are concerned that experimental CV19 mRNA is weakening immune system.
Also, the referenced article being an example, related articles seem to never mention if person having breakthrough case is taking vitamin D3.
Given the mixed messages about media-demonized CV19 that we are constantly getting, its no surprise that many people are taking a caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) stance on getting experimental CV19 mRNA jab.
The Nuremberg Code, ‘Informed Consent’ and Vaccine Mandates (11.10.21)
Can The Government Inject Anything Into Our Veins Without Our informed Consent (7.29.21)
MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,' and 'Sophisticated' (7.17.21)
In fact, although we keep hearing that it's up to constitutionally undefined FDA to decide if a vaccine is safe, the constitutionally indefensible (imo) experimental "vaccine" law indicates that the feds are breaking the law by not reasonably (imo) informing us about possible problems and alternatives to mRNA jab.
The law contains the following language under section (e) which I hope is key.
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies
"(e) Conditions of authorization(1) Unapproved product(A) Required conditions(i)...(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary [Secretary of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product;(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks [emphases added]."
Finally, as a non-medical person, I question if medical history would have turned out better if vitamin D3 had been discovered before vaccines were.
Corrections, insights welcome.
What’s with the term “Breakthrough”????? I’ve been hearing that since last spring when the first shots were administered. Now it is the accepted explanation. What??? If you are “vaccinated” based on their belief about it’s level of protection, how do you get COVID at all? And please define the new term “Breakthrough”—WTF does that mean? It means you got COVID just like the un-vaccinated (and don’t tell me it’s a “milder” case b/c of the vaccine—where are the studies showing that??). That is some serious pretzel logic to think otherwise and my head is hurting even listening to these crazy people.
he took the damn shot...
and now he has covid.
i guess he didn’t think he would get it.
“breakthrough case”
“short illness”
“died of covid”
Treatment is the only positive response to the spread of COVID-19 Wuhan virus. Monoclonal antibodies, extracted from the blood serum of recovered COVID-19 patients, the use of ivermectin, or the combination of zinc ion supplement and some kind of Zn++ ionophore, like Vitamin D3, hydroxychloroquine, quercetin, or even common aspirin, all work very well, thank you, if treatment is started in a timely manner, very early in the course of the disease.
Or they could just get better on their own.