Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeorgianaCavendish

The study actually points out the the lactoferrin used in this in vitro study is specialized and NOT from milk.


11 posted on 12/18/2021 5:53:39 AM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

I read the study paper, itself.

The lactoferrin was an 85+% extract from human female breast milk provided by Millipore Sigma.

Of note, lactoferrin from women is about 90% apolactoferrin and 10% normal lactoferrin.

Fortunately, apolactoferrin is the form more supplements recently use, which they state is just “Lactoferrin.” Case in point is Jarrow Formula’s “Lactoferrin.” It is 100% apolactoferrin, but is named “Lactoferrin.”

It is safe to interpret the “lactoferrin” from the study was about 10% normal lactoferrin (“hololactoferrin” with ferric iron) and 90+% apolactoferrin, which, when used in the study, would provide great insight into how babies across the world are surviving COVID-19 so easily.

Cows make the exact same lactoferrins, but in a different proportion.


16 posted on 12/18/2021 6:32:51 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr
"The study actually points out the the lactoferrin used in this in vitro study is specialized and NOT from milk."

The source is irrelevant. Lactoferrin is lactoferrin...that is just basic chemistry.

18 posted on 12/18/2021 7:00:33 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (Not Responding to Seagull Snark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson