Replies

The heart of medcine has long been the patient-physician relationship and duty of the physician to "prescirbe regimen for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone."

In the COVID plandemic, the Oath has been cynically turned upside down: Hospitals are claiming that their patient-physician relationship" will be violated if a court forces them to allow a patient to receive medication prescribed by his own chosen outside physician. Dying patients can't get a dose of ivermectin, one of the world's safest drugs, lest it harm them!"

We see in this the removal of much good that has long been inherent in the patient-physician relationship, as now supplanted by often-unvarying, hospital administration if not state-controlled medicine. Most people haven't realized how detrimental the top-down prescriptions and protocols already been, even as they may sense that a square peg is being inserted into their round hole in their circumstance. With a coarsely discerning set of criteria, government is now the entity that has presumed the determinant relationship with the patient, often casting aside important benefits of the physician's relationship with that patient.

In one fell swoop, Communism is being ushered in by supplanting the long-implicit patient-physician relationship, where often faith and hope have found their place, now replaced by the iron prescription of government, even as far-off, large interests seek to be paid tens of thousands of dollars for employed tally marks (of respirator use, for example).