Your observation is correct. By the standards asserted for these mRNA inoculations, beginning at two and now up to repeated doses be called for by the manufacturers, the missing element stares us in the face.
The general difficulty of proving a negative.
Asserting that a shot which does not result in an illness is “safe and effective,” then a placebo amount of sterile saline solution also may be asserted to be “safe and effective” against this “pandemic,” so long as no ones dies or suffers side effects.
As a result the furor and debate over the mRNA products is that they are being marketed on this basis, and it is movable,
Case in point, First presented as immunization, it became some sort of lessening agent as to degree of illness, and now is simply an argument into forcing people to participate in a simple phase three clinical trial by force.
I repeat your cogent question. “Has anyone proved the jabs have saved a single life or actually mitigates the effects of the bug? “
No, they have asserted, argued and marketed, but they have not proved. Nor can they.
Exactly - and they tell us, “We know the jabs are working” without ever telling us how they know.
Not to mention they never advertise their actual products like they do other drugs - ostensibly because if they did, they’d have to list the potential side effects. So they just say - “Get jabbed - it’s safe and effective”.