[DugwayDuke]

Polynikes wrote: “Judging from the analysis/comments following it looks to to be flawed.”

The analysis/comments do not justify calling this study flawed since there is no way to judge the expertise of those anonymous commentators.

[Polynikes]

If you look back at their references you can decide for your self. Indeed if you look back the study as the points are illustrated you can see what they are talking about.

One glaring example is the time period involved which points to the Alpha strain which is no longer in circulation.

It still doesn't rationalize giving healthy adolescents and children a substance with a known deadly risk profile vs letting them acquire immunity naturally.