Posted on 12/06/2021 8:13:43 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Democrats including President Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and most of the mainstream media have trotted out the claim that President Trump's tax cuts only benefited wealthy Americans. This dubious line has been used in attempts to justify the tax increases that will be necessary to fund President Biden and congressional Democrats' woke and expensive Build Back Better Act that now faces an uphill battle in the United States Senate. The only problem with their claim about Trump's tax cuts, not a rare one for Democrats seeking to force their agenda on the American people, is that it's just not true.
Thanks to data review and number crunching done by the Heartland Institute's Justin Haskins and published over the weekend in The Hill, the IRS' own ledgers prove that, as Republicans in Congress and President Trump said, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act gave the most tax relief to working-class Americans — not the wealthy who Biden says need to "pay their fair share."
"IRS data prove Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most" (@TheHillOpinion) https://t.co/ngJ8tqylPj pic.twitter.com/UsVyUO9A3C— The Hill (@thehill) December 4, 2021
As it turns out, and contrary to what Democrats are asserting, the Trump tax cuts led those with an adjusted gross income of $15,000 to $50,000 to see an average tax cut of 16 percent to 26 percent in 2018, the first filing year under Trump's tax policy.
Those making $50,000 to $100,000 saw a reduction in their tax bill of 15 percent to 17 percent. Americans earning $100,000 to 500,000 saw a tax cut between 11 percent and 13 percent. As Haskins explains in his op-ed on the data in The Hill, "by comparison, no income group with an AGI of at least $500,000 received an average tax cut exceeding 9 percent, and the average tax cut for brackets starting at $1 million was less than 6 percent."
The Trump tax cuts also increased the amount of revenue brought in through federal taxes, another validation of the theory made legendary by economist Dr. Arthur Laffer. There's a sweet spot on the Laffer Curve when it comes to federal taxes that allows a lower overall tax rate to get the maximum amount of revenue. Raising taxes beyond that point just leads to less income for the government, negating the argument that taxes must go up in order to fund new spending.
But back to the IRS data reviewed by Haskins, he found that "every income bracket with filers earning $200,000 or more increased its tax burden in 2018 compared to 2017, and every income bracket with a top limit lower than $200,000 paid a smaller proportion of the total personal tax revenue collected."
In other words, Trump was right and Democrats were wrong — both then and now. As Haskins points out, Trump's adjustment of the nation's tax policy actually made taxes more progressive, not less. But Biden's party is keen to continue its lies about what Trump's tax cuts did and what Biden's budget would do as congressional Democrats scramble to deliver on Biden's campaign promises ahead of the midterms.
What congressional Democrats included in their Build Back Better Act to fund the Biden administration's woke agenda would undo the progress made by President Trump, harm Americans who are already contributing more now than they were under Obama-era tax policy, and further stunt economic growth as businesses struggle to recover from the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.
Verifying what we all know already. The media lies make it nearly impossible to know the truth about anything. It’s all agenda driven BS.
Yet, their narratives and settle science about taxing the rich and spreading the wealth around never change.
How does a lie become truth and the truth become a lie?
Ask a demonrat politician to explain something like economics, for example, and watch it happen in real time.
Of course, Democrats and the media will tell the lie…..FOREVER.
This was the lead story on NBC over the weekend.
On Bizarro World.
— not the wealthy who Biden says need to “pay their fair share.”
***from my home page
___________________________________________________________________
I proposed a Shallow Exponent Flat Tax.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4006199/posts
Something like Tax = 10% X {[Income]^1.05}
but with the flat tax coefficient more like 2.4 and the exponent more like 1.13......
___________________________________________________________________
Just wondering ... why did you choose the 1.05 exponent?
It was halfway between 1.001 and 1.1, first pass stab at it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.