Posted on 12/02/2021 1:30:31 PM PST by eyeamok
Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any alleged “virus”) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?
(Excerpt) Read more at fluoridefreepeel.ca ...
From another page on site:
We have the evidence that pure, isolated samples of the Covid-19 coronavirus do not exist: a Japanese source has provided us with responses to Freedom of Information requests showing that 10 countries, plus Pfizer itself, do not hold an isolate of SARS-COV-2 (see below).
Thus, the virus does not exist in reality; it exists only in a computer program. For an example, let’s look at the paper entitled “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States” by Harcourt et al. on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.[1] Under the heading “Whole Genome Sequencing,” the authors say “We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”
https://forlifeonearth.weebly.com/proof-the-sars-cov-2-virus-does-not-exist.html
So I ask once again, HOW do you get an Accurate Genome Sequence of a Variant of a Virus that you DON'T HAVE???
How do you get an Accurate Genome Sequence without an isolated pure Virus??
Does 2+2 really equal 5 to that many people??
Well, okay.
Are they considering that a huge amount of people in Africa take Hydroxychloriquin on a regular basis to stave off malaria?
Ping
easy enough to refute such ridiculous lies:
https://www.google.com/search?q=covid-19+isolation+genome
"The final genome of sequenced SARS-CoV-2 consists of a single, positive-stranded RNA that is 29,811 nucleotides long, broken down as follows (GenBank Accession MG772933, RefSeq Accession NC_045512):"You can download Golden Helix for free and view the entire COVID-19 genome sequencing for yourself.
- 8,903 (29.86%) adenosines
- 5,482 (18.39%) cytosines
- 5,852 (19.63%) guanines
- 9,574 (32.12%) thymines
Additionally, there is also the free UCSC COVID-19 Genome Browser allows you to browse the total COVID-19 genome much like Golden Helix.
Enjoy.
SO you think all these Government Agencies LIED on Official Legal Documents when they said they have NO Virus??
Why would they Lie?
eyeamok wrote: “We have the evidence that pure, isolated samples of the Covid-19 coronavirus do not exist:”
Total BS! Essentially, these ‘experts’ are claiming the virus doesn’t exist because it was isolated the way they thought it should be. This has been refuted numerous times:
Article: “Fact Check-SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and its complete genome has been sequenced”
Of course, the anti-vaxxers will now claim that any source that does not match their narrative (such as Reuters) is unreliable yet they will believe these ‘experts’:
One of the ‘experts’ cited is Dr. Thomas who has given up his medical license after he prescribed medication for breast cancer without informing the patient that it had not been approved by medical authorities, and without reviewing her medical file. ‘Dr.’ Thomas is also famous for linking 5G to COVID.
Another ‘expert’ is Dr. Andrew Kaufman who claims that appendicitis—a common inflammation of the appendix which can lead to sepsis and death—is no big deal. According to him, it’s simply constipation, which can be relieved by enema.
Cowanhttps://calmatters.org/health/2021/02/conspiracy-theory-doctor-surrenders-medical-license/
Then another ‘expert’ is Sally Fallon Morell who, along with ‘Dr.’ Cowan, has published several books claiming viruses do not cause disease and that COVID is not contagious.
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/contagion-myth-thomas-s-cowan-md/1137427415
Why would believe anything these quacks? They propagate these myths to entice people to believe in their supplements. You’ll notice ‘Dr.’ Cowan charged $375 for a phone consultations. Ms. Fallon sells various ‘therapeutics’ on her website.
...it exists only in a computer program.
May 2020 — noting that these articles on isolation are five months after the Drosten test was coded in Berlin (January) according to data from China.
“Phylogenetic trees were inferred using the maximum likelihood method implemented in the MEGAX program using the GISAID sequences available at 03-16-2020 (6). Bootstrap support values were calculated from 500 pseudoreplicate trees of the whole data set, Deshylogenetic trees were inferred using the maximum likelihood method implemented in the MEGAX program using the GISAID sequences available at 03-16-2020 (6). Bootstrap support values were calculated from 500 pseudoreplicate trees of the whole data set. Despite a high burden of COVID-19 in Italy, very little information is available to date from full-length high-quality sequences.” From “Isolation and Full-Length Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from COVID-19 Cases in Northern Italy”.... 18 May 2020
“Inferred” appears in this excerpt twice, alongside “very little information”, odd prose in such a document.
https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.00543-20
“Vero CCL-81 cells were used for isolation and initial passage. Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat inactivated fetal bovine serum(5 or 10%) and antibiotic/antimyotic (GIBCO). Both NP an OP swabs were used for virus isolation. For the isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, 50 μl serum free DMEM was pipetted into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate.” In “Isolation and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from the first US COVID-19 patient”....
“Heat inactivated bovine serum” but the May article also references “the first US COVID-19 patient,” though months earlier another CDC article spoke of a different :first.” For more entertainment one can go back to the Fauci days of HIV in which scientists competed for “first/”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239045/
A month later and six months after the Drosten PCR was made, one reads from another of your “search”:articles:
“After 1 h at 37°C, the ESwab medium was replaced by cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium containing 3% fetal calf serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 1% l-glutamine [200 mM], 1% sodium pyruvate, and 1% nonessential amino acids [all from Gibco/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA]). Cells were monitored daily for cytopathic effect (CPE). No CPE was observed until day 4, but virus growth was confirmed by real-time RT-PCR.” From “Complete Genome Sequence of a SARS-CoV-2 Strain Isolated in Northern Germany”....
“Fetal calf serum” sings nicely after four days of testing. And specifically the “real-time RT-PCR” apparently written in January 2020 “confirms.” Based on Chinese data....
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272567/
But to speak about “science” a bit more, and Fauci specficlally, one finds this tidbit:
“The majority of deaths in the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic likely resulted directly from secondary bacterial pneumonia caused by common upper respiratory–tract bacteria. Less substantial data from the subsequent 1957 and 1968 pandemics are consistent with these findings. If severe pandemic influenza is largely a problem of viral-bacterial copathogenesis, pandemic planning needs to go beyond addressing the viral cause alone (e.g., influenza vaccines and antiviral drugs).” From “Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness,” by David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci.... 1 October 2009.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/
Fauci co-penned in 2006 that the large number of 1918 "Spanish flu" deaths came from bacterial pneumonia. If only they had made a moniker and catch all like “COVID-19” they would have....
Why would you go through all this trouble if you created the virus?
I never heard of anyone you mentioned, but if they Have a Purified Isolated Virus, Did they LIE in those Official Legal Documents?? Why would they LIE?
They either have a Purified and Isolated Live Virus or they don’t.
THEY SAID NO
I think alot of this hubbub is the fact the China hasn’t given anyone the original gene sequence.
The thought that none on the planet has been able to culture it and sequence it is a a bit goofy. (Have worked if a virology lab.)
My reading of the genome situation is that there is ONLY ONE genome for SarsCov2. It apparently can be accessed through the NIH NCBI portal (second link below). It was contributed by China back in January 2020 from a sample collected at/by the Wuhan lab back in Dec 2019.
It is not clear if the sequence was developed through a classic isolation, purification, manual sequencing, or from an "in-silico" process that scrambles a non-purified sample into nucleic acids then,through computer simulation, attempts to "reassemble" them into longer and longer chains that eventually match (well enough) to an expected reference sequence (like the bat virus). Given the roughly 1 month of elapsed time from sample collection and publication of the sequence, it is likely an "in-silico" (computer simulation) sequence.
This method is not just inexact it is error prone and may be impossible to replicate. I remember that this reference sequence is about an 88% match to the bat virus ... and apparently that is farther apart, genetically speaking, than humans and cats!
It appears that all other sequences since have been created using the "in-silco" method to match the China Reference sequence.
So, I believe the so-called reference sequence provided by China is most likely a fabricated sequence (in-silico) and ALL subsequent sequences are equally flawed ... to the point that so-called "variants" may merely be errors in the in-silico reconstruction of a virus genome.
All that said, I am not aware of any entity claiming to have isolated, purified, and classically sequenced (not in-silico) the SarsCov2 virus or any of its variants.
Some interesting reading here:
NIH discussion on SarsCov2 detection
and here:
I went down this bunnyhole and my conclusion was that the genomic sequence was NOT from purified samples, but inferred from software from isolates of incomplete sequences.
I drew the line wasting more time on it after a simple logical analysis:
If they had a successful sequence for the virus, they wouldn’t have made all the vaccines based upon the spike protein.
Think about it. Look it up if you’re reading this and don’t believe it. Or don’t. Frankly, I don’t give a damn.
That’s my conclusion and I care not what others believe because there is only one truth here:
The pandemic is a giant fraud with multi-faceted ulterior motives and even IF it could be proven there was no purified virus, it makes no difference and there’s no one who will prosecute pertinent parties.
Thus the aim should be to focus from the distractions, and lay aim upon those who seek to destroy us...and if everyone just focused upon their own sphere this would all come to a crushing end in short order.
eyeamok wrote: “I never heard of anyone you mentioned, but if they Have a Purified Isolated Virus, Did they LIE in those Official Legal Documents?? Why would they LIE?”
You need to read the article. All three were mentioned.
Lots of folks here claim that financial reasons are the only reasons vaccines are being pushed.
Everyone of those three have a financial reason to denigrate the vaccines. All three are pushing a narrative that the ‘natural therapeutics’ they’re selling will protect you from and cure the covid.
eyeamok wrote: “They either have a Purified and Isolated Live Virus or they don’t. THEY SAID NO”
Not so clear cut. I’ve seen this claimed before and once you dig down, these ‘doctors’ base this claim on the method used to purify and isolate the virus. They insist that it must not use modern techniques but that it must be done they way they did it when FDR was president.
The other tell that it’s all a fraud is the glaring lack of comparison of the multiple sequencing claimed by others.
They should all match. I find no evidence of any comparison having been studied. I bet that they do NOT match. I also assert that the sequence provided by the Chinese was so bad that the early efforts at creating a ‘vaccine’ were a failure for just that reason. The ‘S-protein’ efforts were the only ones with tangible results. QED.
The way they’ve designed the ‘vaccines’ is analogous to facial recognition software relying upon hair style.
The other tell: Predictable results (the ‘vaccines’ do not prevent infection, transmission, illness or death). i.e., THEY DO NOT WORK. No wonder they were forced to change the definitions, huh? /s
QED once again.
I believe that researchers discovered during SARS/MERS research (coincidentally funded by Fauxi/NIH) that they could weaponize the spike protein as a blood toxin using the virus as a delivery vehicle.
In a nutshell. And now we see reports (last night) that the Chinese have the ‘magic bullet’...just as I predicted they might since the beginning of this fraud.
Mass death was never the intent: The goal all along was culling of the old/infirm and, most pertinently, chaos. Ironically, it followed a plan they gamed merely months prior.
I don’t understand how people can be so stupid (that’s sarcasm: This is the ‘PANDEMIC OF THE STUPID’)
This has been the single greatest experiment in mass psychosis and mass delusion ever done, and it apparently has captured over 50% of the country
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.