There is an established legal principal that states can impose vaccine mandates via their legilsatures
The point of law to attack this on is this is not a vaccine. It is an experimental gene therapy
“The point of law to attack this on is this is not a vaccine. It is an experimental gene therapy”
Yes, that’s what these things are. The very definition of a “vaccine” was oh-so-conveniently changed just a couple of months before Fauci-19 hit us last March...almost as if someone knew what was going to happen and they were lining their ducks up in a row so that everything would be “legal.”
No, the point of attack (IMHO) to use is that all of these various concoctions are only able to be given under the law authorizing the FDA to issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). In that very law is a clause that specifically allows any person (with no exceptions for the military, mind you) to refuse ANY EUA-authorized medication, based on the fact that (by necessity) there is simply not enough information available to a would-be recipient of such a medication to be able to evaluate its efficacy and its safety (and that’s because the very process of issuing an EUA short-circuits the normal 8-10 year testing period for any medication).