To: naturalman1975
I follow and understand and can concur with most of what you wrote with the exception of:
"Again, I think it's perfectly understandable that measures are taken to stop these people who are either infected themselves or who were living in the same house as infected people - because that's who has been moved - infected people or their primary close contacts) just being able to get out into a city of 150,000 people who they could infect."
Justifiable for smallpox or other terrible communicable diseases. Not for this.
16 posted on
12/01/2021 4:12:35 PM PST by
steve86
(Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
To: steve86
I’m not convinced COVID is serious enough to justify the things some Australian governments have done.
But keeping the disease out of communities where a very significant proportion of the population is immunocompromised - and that is the norm for indigenous people in Australia - where the health care system could not cope with even an outbreak that affected 1 or 2% of the population - that doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.
24 posted on
12/01/2021 4:18:23 PM PST by
naturalman1975
("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
To: steve86
132 posted on
12/01/2021 10:26:01 PM PST by
Varsity Flight
( "War by the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18)
To: steve86
said, "Justifiable for smallpox or other terrible communicable diseases. Not for this."
Couldn't agree more. There needs to be a way to prove this is a genuine emergency and prove their "cure" actually works
134 posted on
12/01/2021 11:07:57 PM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson