https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02795-x
Hybrid immunity is much stronger than just recovery from covid seroconversion. Look down in the study they address naive mrna antibody and B cell titers post covid seroconversion. Naive Mrna with covid post exposure leads to antibody response that is at similar levels to hybrid immunity which is already superior to seroconversion immunity. The titer numbers are in this study get the full print version of it.
Those studying hybrid immunity stress that — whatever the potential benefits — the risks of a SARS-CoV-2 infection mean that it should be avoided. “We are not inviting anybody to get infected and then vaccinated to have a good response,” says Finzi. “Because some of them will not make it through.”
***********************************
But they don’t say a word about those dying and having terrible complications from getting the vaccine.
... and another thing I checked about this Nature magazine before reading the article just to verify whether or not they’re credible. Sure enough, they think the world is ending because of climate change also. In other words they’re feeding everyone a load of crap according to what their masters say.
Interesting article I had not seen. Thanks
Given the extremely low risk to a naturally immune person of a reinfection leading to a bad outcome, to me the real question becomes the reduction in absolute risk conferred by hybrid immunity. Just for an example of the math, pulling numbers out of the air, a .0001 risk is ten times less than a .001 risk, which sounds like a big difference, except that many of us would not find the bigger number, 001, anything worth worrying about.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2108120