Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2

“No substantive proof.”

There are tons of substantive proof. It is just that corrupts officials have it bottled up, as of right now.

Also, if common sense can be allowed in, the vote counting that was stopped simultaneously in battleground states, the mail-in ballots that flooded in after election hours, would tend to make people say there was indeed massive voter fraud.


15 posted on 11/29/2021 6:13:36 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: odawg

Gobs of circumstantial evidence, yes.
Lots of claims of substantive evidence, yes.
Still awaiting the actual data.


17 posted on 11/29/2021 6:28:57 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Statistics don't matter when they happen to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: odawg

“No substantive proof.”


People who say that...and there are many...make me SICK.

And if they just thought about it for more than three minutes they would realize how ridiculous that is.

And nobody here has ANY PROOF THAT I SAID THE ABOVE.

Even if written proof is presented.


26 posted on 11/29/2021 9:00:25 AM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson