Posted on 11/29/2021 3:15:43 AM PST by Kaslin
“Even some of the levels we saw in AZ (17,000 duplicate ballots) would not extrapolate to 81m national votes...]
It was not 17,000 duplicate ballots in AZ, it was 17,000 duplicate ballots in Maricopa County. Big difference.
I like hash! (The food not the drug....well I liked the drug too, in my youth...I digress)
BUT... I don’t want to RE HASH all the statistics and fraudulent votes that we KNOW occurred.
Instead, Whatcha gonna do abodit?
I truly hope SOMETHING will be done. If you put hope in one hand and Joe Biden in the other, which one will fill up first?
It’s a rhetorical question. (That means I already know the answer)
Yes. Another grapeshot blast of anecdotes, promising actionable objective results Real Soon Now(TM).
Wow, this is something that should put thousands of people in jail from each city and state in the US.
The 17,000 votes is not important. Figure out how Biden got 600,000 (impossible) more votes than Obama in fewer dem communities in AZ. Forget this 17,000, Cyber Ninjas weren’t able to do signature matching to mail-in votes.
“No substantive proof.”
People who say that...and there are many...make me SICK.
And if they just thought about it for more than three minutes they would realize how ridiculous that is.
And nobody here has ANY PROOF THAT I SAID THE ABOVE.
Even if written proof is presented.
Familiar with True The Vote? And what they are doing? There are “results”. ..just where to take them is the question...too many MORONS in this country
The RNC is the DNC firewall.
Yup. Actionable objective results Real Soon Now(TM).
“Still awaiting the actual data.”
Well, first of all, pull your head out of your ass, and then go to Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, etc. They have it all documented. And the local authorities are like you, they claim to not see it/not know it/move on.
Of course, “where is it?” is met with “of course it exists” followed by a series of personal insults - absent links or objective indications of progress. Just as has been for the last year. Real Soon Now(TM).
“Of course, “where is it?” is met with “of course it exists” followed by a series of personal insults - absent links or objective indications of progress. Just as has been for the last year. Real Soon Now(TM).”
Absent links?
You can find your freakin links.
If you want to sit back and believe that Joe Biden, whenever he campaigned, and it was not much, could not gather fifty people to come out and see him, got 80 million votes, more than any other candidate in the nation’s history, then it is useless to bother posting you.
Don’t get me wrong: I certainly believe there was critical (as differentiated from “massive”) fraud perpetrated to get Biden elected. I Want To Believe™️.
I’m just observing, as many have/do, that after this long and so many promises of Real Soon Now™️, it’s real hard to take anyone seriously who claims the evidence is real.
To wit: put up or shut up.
And you chose to insult me (again), rather than provide a helpful link. Tells me you got nothin’, for which I have a sad.
“To wit: put up or shut up.
And you chose to insult me (again), rather than provide a helpful link.”
I insult you because I cannot believe that anyone is so dense as to want me to give a link, when there are thousands; people have written books on it describing the theft who witnessed it first hand; soon after the election hundreds of people signed affidavits swearing under penalty of perjury of the fraud they saw; the investigators in Arizona uncovered and documented vast fraud but the authorities there cover it up. Then there is the fraud verified in Georgia that the Republicans cover up. The list is endless.
Steve Bannon and others have spent countless hours exposing the fraud, and you want me to provide you a link?
Seems a lot easier for you to produce voluminous insults than to provide a mere link.
Considering these alleged proofs haven’t been acted on, seems worth questioning.
No not much. MC is about 3/5 of the entire state. The rest of the state offsets Pima (Tucson) and is heavily red, so that’s a wash.
No, if there was massive fraud, it would have to be in MC.
And far more than 2/3 of those dupes would have to be for Trump, which was never proven, cuz they can’t tell how people voted.
This is true, but again, it’s not proven.
I wish it were, but wish in one hand, poop in the other.
The AZ audit found a clear 17,000 duplicates in MC (which is more than 3/5 of the entire state, with the red rurals offsetting blue Pima). Of those 17,000, they could not split evenly. For Trump to have won, it would have to have been proven that he carried more than 2/3 of those dupes-—or, alternatively, that most of those 17,000 were for Biteme (allowing for the 11,000 margin). Even with the follow-up canvass-—and I personally was canvassed and personally know people who counted in the audit-—there has been no report whatsoever that they found either of those alternatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.