Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Last I checked, “unemployed” meant not having a job AND actively seeking one. It doesn’t differentiate between seasonally unemployed, such as agricultural workers or store Santa Clauses, structurally unemployed, such as workers on pipelines shut down by Foe, and cyclically unemployed, such as temporarily laid-off workers, or self-employed individuals with no business coming in, let alone someone fired for refusing the jab. If actively seeking employment, “unemployed”. If discouraged, lazy, or otherwise sitting on hands, merely jobless. It’s a very imprecise standard.


40 posted on 11/28/2021 2:06:56 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Buck Foe Jiden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5; DoughtyOne; Chode

Yes, but just because the law is different from what the Biden gang is doing does not always stop them. Impeachment is supposed to be the remedy but even if you got 67 senate votes to convict, Kamala is Biden’s Spriro Agnew.


45 posted on 11/28/2021 11:52:35 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson