Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

““unless you believe that a nothing-burger of a break-in justified removing a duly elected President.”
“Does the above not imply or suggest he was removed due to a break- in?“

No. The presence of the word “unless” implies the exact opposite.

For example, if I say “…unless you believe pigs can fly” - that does NOT mean I believe pigs can fly. In fact, it means the exact opposite - that I think it’s ridiculous..


102 posted on 11/28/2021 11:43:27 AM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: enumerated
Good grief, Nixon wasn't removed from office for a break-in. It was the lying and coverup...Read the history.

Read the book or remain ignorant

And here once again, you say this is an ignorant comment, when in fact he was removed for lying and the coverup.

lol...

103 posted on 11/28/2021 11:50:12 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: enumerated

Lets cut to the chase, ya say Nixon did not resign because of the lying and coverup. Then tell me, why did Nixon resign?


105 posted on 11/28/2021 11:56:43 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson