Whatever the verdict, this decision, unlike the one in Wisconsin, is not a hill to die on.
“Whatever the verdict, this decision, unlike the one in Wisconsin, is not a hill to die on.”
It’s not a hill at all.
If it is guilty it’d be two good verdicts in a row in these high profile cases.
It’d almost be as if the justice systems works.
> Whatever the verdict, this decision, unlike the one in Wisconsin, is not a hill to die on. <
Yep. Rittenhouse was obviously innocent. But in this case, an argument could be made that those guys are guilty...of something. (Not saying I’d agree. But the argument could be made.)