Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ducttape45

NAVY SEAL 1, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 8:21-cv-2429-SDM-TGW

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, et al.,

Defendants.
___________________


2 posted on 11/22/2021 12:39:26 PM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: \/\/ayne

Mixed bag result.

Plaintiffs in active duty service - that case continues.

Other plaintiffs have sued in the wrong court, or have other remedies, or have sued on the wrong basis.

As to the active duty, the court suggests that the religious exemption is a phatom, an illusory accomodation that exists only on paper, not in practice, and that those who persist along the path pof seeking one are removed from service. Inbteresting that being fired from service is called punishment. In the civilian world, being fired is not punishment.


12 posted on 11/22/2021 1:46:00 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson