From one fidiot:
Let’s recap what Rittenhouse did. He’s a teenage Trumpist who carried a machine gun, and shot at three protesters, murdering two of them, and wounding another. He murdered two people — political opponents — in cold blood.
The defence called all this self-defence, and the jury bought it. Of course, it wasn’t self defence. If you’re carrying a machine gun, there are about a hundred things you can do before shooting to kill multiple times, and then shooting someone in the back with a “kill shot.” You can fire over their heads, you can fire at the street, you can fire in the air. You can lay down your gun and take out the bullets and walk away. You can do literally a thousand things instead of murder people in cold blood. Murder is not self-defence when you are the only carrying a machine gun.
As I said. Fidiot!
That particular idiot is clearly Eurpoean, and wouldn’t know the business end of a rifle if it poked them in the rear.