Well nutty thinking perhaps but it also proved that at heart the two jurors weren’t nuts. Some people need the clearest connections possible from the crime to the criminal in order to convict...they worry about God confronting them had the voted mistakenly.
These two nice older ladies were quite imporessed by the presumption of innocence, which is repeated like 100 times a day, and the environment is designed to be intimidating to the public. It takes a bit of effort to “shake back to reality.”
They had no issue with defending their point of view to God, that for sure! They just put an impossible burden on prosecution - I think because the presumed innocent phrase was drilled into the jury.