Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1

That “misdemeanor” would have justified their whole case that he was there illegally possessing a firearm. Or it would have never happened, therefore no justification for “Lawful” self defense or against any of the other charges...

This was a huge technicality they argued about heavily. Which luckily was dropped, or it would have nulled his whole claim and defense of “lawful self defense”.


350 posted on 11/18/2021 10:49:30 AM PST by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind

You should read more Andrew Branca on self-defense law.

So should have the defense lawyers. The prosecution has repeatedly misstated self defense law over and over and the defense never shouted him down.

Kyle should hire Branca for his appeal or retrial because his current lawyers failed him.


364 posted on 11/18/2021 11:11:35 AM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson