Posted on 11/16/2021 8:31:49 PM PST by janetjanet998
This was part of the mistrial motion filed yesterday
The HD version wasn't turned over to the defense until last Saturday NOV 13th after the defense rested
full size of the original defense video 3.6MB 480 X 12 full size of the States video 11.2 MB. 1920 X 844
A mistrial DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE = game over.
Double Jeopardy attaches. Can’t retry Kyle.
A mistrial b/c jury can’t reach verdict = can retry it.
So we need the prosecutor bad actions to give it the ‘with prejudice’ dismissal or the jury to find Kyle not guilty.
Most insurance policies do NOT cover “civiil unrest” or rioting.
A purse loss - business killing - loss for many of these businesses.
Two “H”s in “WITHHELD”.
That’s not all the creeps withheld.
The motion states, ‘As it relates to the compressed drone footage. The prosecution should be required to explain to the court why they did not copy the footage for the defendant with the same quality as their copy
‘The video footage has been at the center of this case. The idea that the state would provide lesser quality footage and then use that footage as a linchpin in their case is the very reason they requested and were granted the provocation instruction by the Court.’
Lawyers for Rittenhouse filed their motion for mistrial with prejudice based on this and several other grounds.
They had already raised the issue of ‘prosecutorial misconduct’ and ‘over-reach’ for Binger’s behavior when he ‘violated’ Rittenhouse’s constitutional right to remain silent by suggesting that he had done so that he could ‘tailor’ his story to fit the facts as they emerged during trial.
And for his bid to enter evidence into trial that had already been excluded by the judge. Both transgressions came the day that Rittenhouse testified and saw Judge Schroeder furiously admonish the prosecutor telling him, ‘This better stop.’
Now, in the motion filed Monday, Rittenhouse’s defense team has re-iterated Corey Chirafisi’s contention in court that Binger’s behavior was ‘clearly intentional’ and ‘prejudicial.’
And remember according to a report today they also knew who Jump Kick Man was and he wanted immunity to come and testify. They never told the defense his identity!
SLEAZE.
The DA won DA of the Year for Wisconsin last year.
Mercy.......May this be the answer to all our prayers!
That’s cause fir dismal with prejudice
These past 20 years, many conservative cheered on every CIA/Neocon instigated Color Revolution. Max Boot, Ben Shapiro, Bill Kristol, etc., would scream Freedom! Democracy! Freedom! -- and like lemmings, conservatives supported military intervention.
But now we know what it's like to be on the receiving end of a CIA/Deep State led Color Revolution. BLM/Antifa screamed Freedom! but that doesn't mean it's what their revolution was about.
That’s not the way discovery works
“The DA won DA of the Year for Wisconsin last year.”
In this particular instance, I’m going with DA = Dumb Azz. Additionally, I understand that the consumption of too much cheese clogs the brain pan.
I wouldn’t be surprised. This kind of crap goes on all over Wisconsin. The DA wants the judge’s job. He wants a promotion.
It would be better for Rittenhouse to be acquitted by a jury.
I would think they do, but even a good investigator couldn't have helped with these liars.
That is probably on purpose. Giving the feds a shot at persecution after Kyle is acquitted on the current charges.
“Just because buildings get burned down doesn’t mean it’s a violent riot,”
Remind me of when one of Clinton’s attorneys (Robert Reich?) said that just because there was semen on the dress doesn’t mean there was sex.
“It would be better for Rittenhouse to be acquitted by a jury.”
Ideally. But that won’t happen ‘cause the jurors know without a doubt how evil these people are. They know without a doubt their lives will be a living hell forever if they acquit.
Maybe the best outcome would be for them to vote guilty, and then have the judge reverse it. Then the jurors and their families would be safe from violence.
“In any trial the judge is the ultimate decision maker and has the power to overturn a jury verdict if there is insufficient evidence to support that verdict or if the decision granted inadequate compensatory damages. The term used to describe this action is judgement notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or judgement of acquittal in a criminal case.”
No matter what happens, Kyle’s life is over, whether in person or not.
Sandmann’s life is not over......neither is Kyle’s
The bad guys don’t get to win!
Just watch!
“His attorneys don’t have investigators?”
Investigators aren’t necessary. For discovery, it is REQUIRED that ALL evidence be provided to the opposing side. They clearly broke the law by withholding evidence.
Indeed. Criminal Law 101.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_v._Maryland
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that established that the prosecution must turn over all evidence that might exonerate the defendant (exculpatory evidence) to the defense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.