[LambSlave]

Binger argued that Rittenhouse did “nothing to demonstrate to the crowd that he isn’t a threat to kill again,” saying he should have fired warning shots.

Now I've heard it all... a prosecutor who says you SHOULD fire warning shots. Okay

[hanamizu]

Now I’ve heard it all... a prosecutor who says you SHOULD fire warning shots. Okay

---

Not just a prosecutor, the current occupant of the White House is on the record saying the same thing...and the clear choice of 81 million Americans can be wrong.
/s

[BiglyCommentary]

“a prosecutor who says you SHOULD fire warning shots”

I’m certain there was a non BLM person who was charged with a reckless discharge count by doing that very thing. That story was posted here. So this DERANGED WHACK JOB IS FULL OF IT.

[WMarshal]

“Now I've heard it all... a prosecutor who says you SHOULD fire warning shots. Okay”

From a Wisconsin attorney in May of 2019:

Should I Shoot a Warning Shot?
As a responsibly armed citizen, you must remember that you are responsible for every round that leaves your firearm. And don't forget: “What goes up must come down.” Just because you weren't intending to hurt someone or damage something doesn't mean you won't.

In many places (check your local laws), a warning shot may be considered a use of deadly force. Even though you probably intend to fire a “warning,” you could potentially hurt or even kill someone with that shot. Therefore, the act of taking that shot could be viewed by the justice system as deadly force.”
Source: https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/should-i-shoot-a-warning-shot/