Damn you, sir. You knew I'd have to look...
On another note, Mz Bitecofer has her own Wikipedia Page which contains the following:
Bitecofer argues that instead of ideology, Democratic candidates should "lean in" to being Democrats and abandon the preference of Democrats to nominate unobtrusive, "Blue Dogs" who run against their own party's brand. The fact that progressive favorites like Stacey Abrams and Beto O'Rourke often came much closer to winning their races in red states in 2018 than Blue Dog moderates who tried to ingratiate themselves with Trump has been held as validation for her theory.[2] As has the successful campaigns of Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff in Georgia[11] and Mark Kelly in Arizona.
Strange for a so-called senior adviser to a supposedly Republican organization like the Lincoln Project to be giving such sage advice to Democrats.
How much more proof is necessary to show that the Lincoln Project is what we've known it to be all along - a false flag operation?
How much more proof is necessary to show that the Lincoln Project is what we've known it to be all along - a false flag operation?
True about the Lincoln Project, though how much the leaders are part of the deception and how much they are dupes is harder to say. They make very good dupes but are also practiced at deception. The Bulwark gets money from the same sources.
Bitecofer has her hand in a lot of different stuff. Her employer, the Niskanen Center, is intended to give Democrat policies a libertarian veneer. They started with climate change, but are giving more and more support to the Democrats. Bitecover's political action committee, Strike Pac, is even more clearly dedicated to electing Democrats.