I’m sorry, but it sounds like Barr was enforcing the rule of law and respect for private property. The implications of disclosure of the information in the diary could affect a national election, and transportation of stolen property across state lines is a Federal crime.
Reportedly she had abandoned the diary when she checked out of a rehab center. Assuming that’s true, and someone found it, is that really theft?
“The National Stolen Property Act of 1934 (NSPA) (18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 et seq.) prohibits the transportation in interstate or foreign commerce of any goods with a value of $5,000 or more with the knowledge that they were illegally obtained, and prohibits the “fencing” of such goods.”
Not sure that applied here, do you?
What if: it wasn’t really stolen to begin with?
“...transportation of stolen property across state lines is a Federal crime.”
This sounds much more like “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
Show me the federal statute that authorizes the DOJ/FBI to investigate petty theft of someone's personal property.
Show me how that diary could could contain classified US government information.
Show me the federal statute that authorizes the DOJ/FBI to investigate petty theft which crosses state lines.
You can't show me any of these things because they don't exist.
“ I’m sorry, but it sounds like Barr was enforcing the rule of law and respect for private property”
Please, spare me.
L
Unless the diary was just a pretext for the raid.
A truthful diary, unlike the Steele dossier, which as a work of total fiction, couldn't possibly affect a national election...
Surely you’re being facetious.
Yes I’m calling you Shirley.
Asinine post on your part.. on so many levels.