To: bitt
If Veritas decided against publishing it they must have determined it was phony to begin with.
To: DoodleDawg
If Veritas decided against publishing it they must have determined it was phony to begin with. They did not publish it because they could not verify it. That's a long way from determining it was phony to begin with.
27 posted on
11/13/2021 8:44:09 AM PST by
usurper
( version )
To: DoodleDawg
“If Veritas decided against publishing it they must have determined it was phony to begin with.”
Phony and unverified are two different things. In this case, it seems the FBI just verified its validity.
39 posted on
11/13/2021 9:05:36 AM PST by
Bshaw
(A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
To: DoodleDawg
If Veritas decided against publishing it they must have determined it was phony to begin with.
Or as they said, they merely determined that they could not verify it.
71 posted on
11/16/2021 6:07:02 AM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson