How many times is the jury going to need to watch that fuzzy drone video clip with the prosecutor's repeated insistence that what they declare is what the jurors should see? The jury already heard the forensic manipulator of the image say he doesn't know what way or how the software program altered the image to get it to the state it is in at this point.
After all of the prosecutor's failures in this case, the jury may realize this is the state's swan song. Through the whole trial, the state didn't present this fuzzy theory until both sides rested their case. I wouldn't buy into it.
Finally, the prosecution describes this occurred after Kyle put down the fire extinguisher. Makes more sense that Kyle was simply adjusting/shifting the rifle and strap after bending over. The state's argument is full of holes.
I just don’t see the jury unanimously agreeing to co vict this kid of at the homicide charge after the crap show they witnessed.