Footnotes too! Brought a smile to my face more than once. Genius to quote Roberts ...
The Commerce Clause power may be expansive, but it does not grant Congress the power to regulate noneconomic inactivity traditionally within the States' police power. See Sebelius, 567 U.S. at 554 (Roberts, C.J., concurring) ("People, for reasons of their own, often fail to do things that would be good for them or good for society. Those failures-joined with the similar failures of others-can readily have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. Under the Government's logic, that authorizes Congress to use its commerce power to compel citizens to act as the Government would have them act.");
I wonder if folks who’ve already been fired have any recourse in light of this...?
“noneconomic inactivity”
Now there is a new double negative for me.