In all cases where a State is a party to the action, the supreme Court SHALL have Original Jurisdiction.
the word “Shall” means MANDATORY
the word “may” means advisory only
The inferior lower courts created by Congress have NO LEGAL AUTHORITY to even Hear a case when the STATE is a PARTY
READ THE FRIKKIN CONSTITUTION. And tell the Judge to POUND SAND, then Arrest and Prosecute him on Constitutional Violations and Usurping the Rights of a Free State and it’s citizens in Direct Violation of the US Constitution.
LOCK HIM UP
I make no assertion that this is valid, but merely what the Supreme Court itself holds regarding original jurisdiction:
Original jurisdiction consists of the RIGHT to hear a case first, not the NECESSITY. The necessity is called Exclusive Jurisdiction. The Supreme Court delegates to these lower federal courts the jurisdiction which it originally holds.
As expressed by STATUTE (which of course is invalid if not constitutional, so this is only an expression of how the law is interpreted, not proof of the validity of this interpretation):
(a)The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies between two or more States.
(b)The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of:
(1)All actions or proceedings to which ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, or vice consuls of foreign states are parties;
(2)All controversies between the United States and a State;
(3)All actions or proceedings by a State against the citizens of another State or against aliens.