I know that. My point is NATO is hell of a lot closer to that conflict than the USA. It should be up to them to take action.
Look, “Ukraine”, like “Yugoslavia”, is an amalgamation of unlike peoples crammed in together as a result of a war - WW I in the case of Yugoslavia, WW II in the case of Ukraine.
And like Yugoslavia, Ukraine will be a potential source of violence until it is broken up into its European (Western) part and Russian (Eastern) part.
The people in Washington, and even here, who have a hard-on for war to defend this imaginary country want war with Russia. It’s very difficult to understand how we could possibly profit from such a war, but it’s very easy to understand how we could be irreversibly damaged from it.
My suspicion is, it’s an attempt to drag us (again) into a blood feud which existed before the United States did and will persist after we are gone.
And, by the way, congratulations on beating McAuliffe. I think Youngkin is terrible, obviously, but our people throwing their weight around by voting may at least postpone another war here, which is what should interest all patriots more than what happens in “Ukraine”.