[TexasGator]

“From DOJ site:

“Conspiracy to suborn perjury may be prosecuted irrespective of whether perjury has been committed.”

From DOJ site (WITH LINK)

---

1752. SUBORNATION OF PERJURY

To establish a case of subornation of perjury, a prosecutor must demonstrate that perjury was committed; that the defendant procured the perjury corruptly, knowing, believing or having reason to believe it to be false testimony; and that the defendant knew, believed or had reason to believe that the perjurer had knowledge of the falsity of his or her testimony.

To establish a case of subornation of perjury, a prosecutor must demonstrate that perjury was committed; that the defendant procured the perjury corruptly, knowing, believing or having reason to believe it to be false testimony; and that the defendant knew, believed or had reason to believe that the perjurer had knowledge of the falsity of his or her testimony.

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

There's a difference between the offense of subornation of perjury and conspiracy to suborn perjury.

[Covenantor]

You should have kept reading to the end and you would have found the direct quote regarding conspiracy to suborn perjury which I cut and pasted.

" From DOJ site: “Conspiracy to suborn perjury may be prosecuted irrespective of whether perjury has been committed.

” Speed reading and stopping at the point that confirms your bias is just not honest...but then you already knew that.