Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

.
They FBi knew of Dolan in 2016.

In 2006, he was followed taking files into the Russian Embassy. In 2009, he was trying to buy classified info.

They knew he was the sub-source in 2016, and after he told them the dossier was not accurate, the FBi used it to get more FISA warrants and never told the court Danchenko repudiated it, or that he was a a Russian spy/asset.


15 posted on 11/05/2021 3:37:00 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano (‘’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: All

CORRECTED

.
The FBi knew of Danchenko being the primary sub-source in 2016.

In 2006, he was followed taking files into the Russian Embassy. In 2009, he was trying to buy classified info.

They knew he was the sub-source in 2016, and after he told them the dossier was not accurate, the FBi used it to get more FISA warrants and never told the court Danchenko repudiated it, or that he was a a Russian spy/asset.


16 posted on 11/05/2021 3:44:30 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano (‘’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: AnthonySoprano

I I RC the FBI claimed that Darchenko could be believed …. because he had repudiated the lies he had originally said. Of course the FBI did not include WHY they said Darchenko was trustworthy. They just used their completely misleading statement to continue getting more FISA warrants. Many people should be in jail over this


17 posted on 11/05/2021 3:48:44 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson