Luck Be a Lady Tonight
What about “Under My Thumb” by The Rolling Stones?
The feminists must really hate THAT one!
Already begun. The Stones have dropped “Brown Sugar” from their set list after performing it for 50 years.
Given the current leftist strategy of doubling down on their offensive stupidity, the thought police should absolutely go for it.
First step is to silence the trannys.
Oh just in time to begin the assault on all vintage (1940-1950) Christmas season songs. Baby its Cold outside being the first they go after.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MFJ7ie_yGU
.
There ya go, rap lyrics.
Case closed.
Years ago I read an article in a nutshell stated that out the most frequently played songs at proms and weddings, most were from the 70s and 80s. Not much newer stuff.
You didn’t think they would stop after all the statues were destroyed, did you? Now it’s rock songs. What’s next? The national anthem? (yes). The flag? (yes). Your money? (yes) Your guns? (yes) Your children? (yes).
Not to worry, American Rock will live on in freedom in former Soviet Romania:
The list of possibilities for “trigger warnings” and outright censorship is near endless.
Luck Be a Lady Tonight
The drivers of Rock and Roll’s popularity was: going against the norm; youthful exuberance; and young love.
So naturally, the people who think they’re in control want to kill that vibe.
Guess what, that which you don’t kill only grows stronger, b!tc#.
I don’t care what people say, Rock and Roll is here to stay.
The Stones stopped playing Brown Sugar, so yeah, it’s coming.
“Should things that white men like be toppled? Yes. Yes, they should.”
No. Not even “Feelings” or “Stairway To Heaven”. We keep them ALL.
David Ng, if you somehow inherited the TMZ beat at Breitbart, move on to something better; if you're the one initiating this TMZombie coverage at Bb, just STOP.
You are not framiNG these awful sub-woke-but-genuinely-lame 'subjects' nearly as sharply as Breitbart would; just for starters, don't make them strawman listcicles. Oy.
Look, at Bb, you need to have some panache, yet simultaneously punch down hard on that fugly tranny author, the biased NYET source, and the ridiculous topic. All of them. For example, has the NYET ever once offered an op-ed slot to a tranny who has detransitioned?
Also stop writing at obvious 2500-word targets, you need push back on that on Wynton and Alex.
You could be a decent conservative journalist but you are a work-in-progress right now.
And speaking of the fugly tranny author of the unoriginal NYeT chop-ed:
