Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India’s Recent Nuclear-Capable Missile Test Not Meant as a Warning Shot to Beijing, Experts Say
Epoch Times ^ | 11/04/2021 | J.M. Phelps

Posted on 11/04/2021 9:54:39 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

India’s recent testing of a nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missile came on the heels of failed military and diplomatic talks between India and China, as well as reports of a hypersonic missile test by the Chinese regime.

But experts told The Epoch Times that India’s test-fire was not a retaliatory response to the regime’s recent actions.

Agni-5 Capabilities

Animesh Roul, executive director of the New Delhi-based Society for the Study of Peace and Conflict, said this was not the first time India test-fired an Agni-5 surface-to-surface ballistic missile. In 2012, 2013, and 2018, the Agni-5 was tested several times.

“However, the Oct. 27 test at Odisha coast’s Abdul Kalam Island was the first trial of the missile by the Strategic Forces Command that deploys India’s nuclear arsenal,” he said.

This confirms that Agni-5 nuclear-capable missiles could be quickly deployed from strategic locations in India, Roul added.

The missile test was also significant because it reaffirmed “India’s official policy to have credible minimum deterrence and commitment to no first use, and it is also the first to be used by India’s Strategic Force Command,” said Mahesh Debata, an assistant professor at India’s Jawaharlal Nehru University.

With a launch weight of nearly 100 thousand pounds, this nuclear-capable missile can carry a warhead of up to 3,000 pounds. India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) reported that the Agni-5 missile has a maximum range of up to 3,600 miles.

Others, including Du Wenlong, a researcher at the People’s Liberation Army’s Academy of Military Sciences, have suggested a range of nearly 5,000 miles. If this is the case, the Agni-5 has the ability to strike nearly all of mainland China, reaching as far as the northernmost region of the country.

Continued Crisis

Border disputes between India and China have existed for many decades, and these unresolved territorial disputes have resulted in a number of conflicts through the years.

A violent clash between Indian and Chinese armed forces in the remote Himalayan region of eastern Ladakh in early May 2020 brought any chance of resolving disputes to a new low, Roul said. There were reportedly dozens of injuries and deaths on both sides.

In response to the deadly face-off, he said, “both sides have beefed up force deployment with tens of thousands of soldiers [and] weaponry ever since.”

Following multiple rounds of military and diplomatic talks, Roul said signs of disengagement had begun. But he went on to note that the 13th round of military talks between India and China in October ended in a stalemate without further headway. “So, border issues between the two countries remain volatile,” he said.

According to Roul, the ongoing tensions between the two countries could give reason for the Chinese regime to take the Agni-5 testing as a sign of aggressive military posturing by India.

Not a Warning Shot

Some experts have described the Agni-5 missile launch as a warning shot from India to China.

Roul disagreed, saying that it would not be sensible for any country to “display its missile muscle as a warning shot, or as part of any aggressive or defensive posturing.”

“India is very well aware of superior Chinese missile capabilities, and flexing [its own] muscles would be futile and counterproductive [to diplomatic and military talks],” he said.

Debata also said it is “not right to assume” that the successful test of Agni-5 missile from off the coast of Odisha was “a warning for any country or targeted at any particular country.”

Missile testing is not uncommon in India. Prior to the Agni-5, Roul said four other missiles have been operationally deployed with different ranges and payload capabilities. India could simply be showing China “its ongoing development in ground-based conventional missile and nuclear forces,” he said.

Debata said, “Since the inaugural test of Agni category missiles in 1989, it has been a potent force of India’s defense system and its present launching could be described as a right step to further spruce up India’s defense capabilities.”

At a time when the Chinese regime is putting its nuclear capabilities on full display, Roul said “the test may help India build a domestic consensus and reassurance about its military capabilities and overall morale of the armed forces.”

The Agni-5 missile is “clearly part of India’s strategic deterrence vis-à-vis China,” he added.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; icbm; india; testing

1 posted on 11/04/2021 9:54:39 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, did China take it as a warning?


2 posted on 11/04/2021 10:02:32 PM PDT by Mark17 (USAF ATCer, Retired. Father of USAF pilot. ATCers & pilots, the quintessential elements of aviation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I am certain that the Indian missile’s payload was a candygram and a bouquet of flowers.

Whoever wrote this article is an idiot for even leading credence to the claim.

I don’t have a problem with India being a nuclear power since they have to deal with an aggressive China but we don’t have to lie about their military preparation for war.


3 posted on 11/04/2021 10:17:16 PM PDT by WMarshal ("Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal

“they have to deal with an aggressive China”

And the Islamic State of Pakistan.


4 posted on 11/04/2021 11:12:47 PM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi
And the Islamic State of Pakistan.

... Which possesses atomic weapons.

Regards,

5 posted on 11/04/2021 11:48:12 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well that’s true and the same sense that China said that it hyper speed vehicle test was nothing more than a test of a spaceship.


6 posted on 11/05/2021 4:19:58 AM PDT by rottweiller_inc (inter canem et lupum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson