Big mess in the death report. For the ISS, most of the deaths were not caused by Covid [Italian COVID-19 Death Count Dramtically overstated]

ilTempo ^ | October 21, 2021 | Franco Bechis

[SoConPubbie]

Translated from Italian to English using Google Translate:

According to the new report (which had not been updated since July) from the Higher Institute of Health on mortality from Covid, the virus that brought the world to its knees would have killed far less than a common flu. It seems a bizarre and no vax statement, but according to the statistical sample of medical records collected by the institute, only 2.9% of the deaths registered since the end of February 2020 would be due to Covid 19. So of the 130,468 deaths registered by official statistics at the time of preparation of the new report only 3,783 would be due to the power of the virus itself. Because all the other Italians who lost their lives had from one to five diseases which, according to the ISS, therefore already left them little hope. Even 67.7% would have had more than three contemporary diseases together, and 18% at least two together.

Now I personally know many people, but none who have the misfortune of having five serious illnesses at the same time. I would like to trust our scientists, then I go to read the ailments listed which would be no secondary reason for the loss of so many Italians and I begin to feed some profane doubts. According to the ISS, 65.8% of Italians who are no longer there after being infected with Covid were ill with arterial hypertension, that is, they had high blood pressure. 23.5% were also demented, 29.3% added some diabetes to their ailments, 24.8% also atrial fibrillation. And that's not enough: 17.4% already had sick lungs, 16.3% had had cancer in the last 5 years; 15.7% suffered from heart failure, 28% had ischemic heart disease, 24.8% suffered from atrial fibrillation, more than one in ten were also obese.

It will all be true, I do not question our scientists. But if it is not the virus that kills the Italians, then can you explain to me why science has imposed everything we have seen in this abundant year and a half? From masks, to spacing, to lockdown and so on? And how did we manage to have almost 126,000 Italians reduced to those conditions with 3, 4 or 5 serious illnesses, destined to go away if the coronavirus never existed in a short time? Those numbers would be a sensational indictment against the Italian health system from which they also come. I use the conditional because I have some doubts about what is written from the first day in that report. Which is affected as every communication of the ISS or the CTS of the government directives provided gradually over the months.

At the beginning the government then in charge, that of Giuseppe Conte, while Italy showed itself to be the most unprepared country in the world and also unable to face the pandemic, asked for data to reassure the Italians. And I remember well the weekly ISS and civil protection press conferences in which these deaths were always minimized, always placing the emphasis on the many pathologies found in those who had not made it. It must be said that this virus did not kill itself, but accompanied by other ailments in frail people it could hasten an end that was in any case near. Then during the vaccination campaign the government need became the diametrically opposite: dramatize and push anyone towards the safety of the vials made available. which it followed in its increasingly thin and never drummed publication, the approach given at the beginning. A great confusion, therefore, which also feeds fears and stiffens the resistance of a few million Italians who have chosen to avoid vaccination. Perhaps with a little less propaganda, less rigidity and more correct information this would not be the case ... less rigidity and more correct information all this would not be so ... less rigidity and more correct information all this would not be so. ..

[SoConPubbie]

Ping!

[TigersEye]

I'm shocked. Aren't you guys shocked?

[datura]

All part of the plan!

Now pointing out the lies is “disinformation”.

[blueplum]

of that list, technically only the dementia ‘had no hope’. All the rest can and do live for years with their conditions; even heart failure and ‘sick lungs’ can be managed.

Limiting consideration of death counts to only those perfectly healthy is euthansia-centric thinking.

[VanShuyten]

I think he’s pointing out that the deaths due to the virus alone were fairly uncommon, but the virus exacerbated existing serious illnesses enough to hasten deaths. If true, then there should be a drop in deaths due to these conditions in the future because of this culling of the already ill.

[minnesota_bound]

FTA: 130,468 deaths registered by official statistics at the time of preparation of the new report only 3,783

Here in the USA:
CDC report that shows that only 6 percent of reported COVID deaths were people who died of COVID alone.

This is why the criminals focus on cases and not deaths. They want to make it scarier when it is nothing. This is a Plandemic.

Masks do not block viruses. 1,000 times smaller then the weave of face masks.

CDC Covid-19 Survival Rates as of 10/2020
Age 0-19 — 99.997%
Age 20-49 — 99.98%
Age 50-69 — 99.5%
Age 70+ — 94.6%

80%+ of the deaths are people 65 and older.
About 12% 55-64

Pandemic Death Toll by % of Population Year of Population Estimate
Black Death 51.0% 1300
Plague of Justinian 19.1% 500
Smallpox 12.1% 1500
Antonine Plague 2.6% 200
Spanish Flu 2.5% 1919
The Third Plague 1.0% 1850
HIV/AIDS 0.7% 1981

COVID-19 0.03% 2021 (as of March 15) <—— !!!!

[Sirius Lee]

"Oopsie! We helped shut down the economies of the Western World, made you lose your business or job, made you wear useless masks, and it was all for no reason at all.
But hey, the good news is that you still get to take an unsafe and ineffective injection designed to reduce the world population. In fact we will make you take it, or else. Your kids, too!"

[mewzilla]

CoupFlu has NEVER been about public health anywhere on the frickin’ planet.