Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
... who was trespassing because some petty tyrant a-hole didn't like his landscaping.

They had a legal right to be there according to city law.

118 posted on 10/28/2021 2:51:05 PM PDT by al_c (Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: al_c
They had a legal right to be there according to city law.

When did the City Law grow to the point where killing someone over lawn care became an option? That's my point...

128 posted on 10/29/2021 8:40:20 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: al_c
They had a legal right to be there according to city law.

And just why was a "law" passed to give the city that "right"?

Every law ultimately ends with the possibility of lethal actions to enforce it. The folks who say "there otta be a law" had best keep this in mind. Is it worth killing a crazy person because he won't mow his lawn and objects with threats of force to persons ordered onto his property to do that?

Maybe it is. But saying "because it's the law" is not a sufficient justification.

Laws only work because most people will consent to them.

134 posted on 10/29/2021 11:27:47 AM PDT by flamberge (Everybody knows that the dice are loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson