Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank

Including anything that is not capable of fully automatic fire in the “assault weapon” category is blatant misrepresentation and a bald-faced lie.

Balanced my butt. When the FIRST sentence has a falsehood, the entire article is untrustworthy and tainted.


3 posted on 10/27/2021 8:35:14 AM PDT by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Don W

What’s wrong with “Personal Defense Weapon”?

That’s what “they” call them. Right?


14 posted on 10/27/2021 8:56:56 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Don W

“Assault weapon” is a term made up by airheads on the left and applied to anything that scares them.

If you ask any such airhead to describe, in detail, an AR — they can’t except to point at piccies.

AS to the AR ban, it expired after ten years when no study anywhere could show that it had any effect whatsoever on shootings. Worthless posturing.

And having one has nothing to do with patriotism, yah TWOT. It is an easy weapon to use and even your grandmother could take out someone assaulting her with one of these. It is easy and accurate.


22 posted on 10/27/2021 9:47:25 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson