Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: j.havenfarm

I’d like a second opinion. Any other lawyers want to chime in?


14 posted on 10/22/2021 9:11:45 PM PDT by null and void (LGBTQ = Let's Get Biden To Quit, FORK/N'A = First Uttery Cancel Kamala/Nancy Axed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Yeah, I slept through my torts class my first year of law school.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_prosecution


17 posted on 10/22/2021 9:19:56 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (20 years on Free Republic, 12/10/20! More than 3700 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

No lawyer, but the judges remarks suggest a strong bias, so maybe they can appeal.

It seems all might take to knock down this house of cards would be one favorable ruling for one defendant, or ‘official’ acknowledgement or recognition anywhere that fraud altered the outcome. Then you could say the actions of defendants were undertaken to preserve the government, etc.

That might win in front of a jury, say in Loudon County.
Call me romantic I guess, but I still think sometimes right gives might.


24 posted on 10/22/2021 10:06:16 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Could they get any mileage out of this:

"'...but I want the sentence to hurt,' Walton said."

That doesn't seem impartial to me.

26 posted on 10/22/2021 10:14:31 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson