Posted on 10/18/2021 5:05:59 AM PDT by NautiNurse
OMG my heart is broken reading that. My family got the shots, too, except me, hubby & my brother, and I am so scared about that.
My 74 year old mom flew 4x from CA to MN since C0V1D was in effect. The 1st three times pre-shots, the 4th (a few months after her 2nd shot), she came down with it on her 2nd day in MN, and quarantined at my cousin’s big farm. Fortunately it only felt bad 4-5 days, so I am grateful she made it while tremendously sad and horrified about your mother. 😥💧
“Isn’t Powell the perfect candidate for the vaccine as per the CDC and Fauci. It didn’t work.”
The vaccine wasn’t going to save him from multiple myeloma, which is what was soon going to kill him. Covid merely hastened the process by a few days.
Not what was reported nor not what was blasted everywhere to take the vaccine to protect yourself and loved ones from getting COVID, spreading it, being hospitalized nor dying from it. The vaccine failed in all these areas spectacularly.
They can mandate vaccines but dosing twice in a week is a malpractice. No care facility stipulate that timeline in its mandate.
I’d be curious to know when Powell received his vackseen. If it was more than 6 months ago, the antibodies may be gone if he didn’t take a booster.
He had multiple myeloma. Very possible he never developed adequate antibodies after receiving the vaccine.
Powell already had one foot in the grave-Cancer, COVID an VAXed- he is a lousy example.
But Powell's death is consistent with the story that physicians are finding rare, aggressive cancers in people who wouldn't be expected to have them.
If the natural immune systems are being reprogramed by the vaxxes, then Powell's cancer may have been given a boost by his immune system being shut down by the vax.
It was widely reported that, at the time of his death, Colin Powell was hospitalized at Walter Reed after testing positive for Covid. He had multiple myeloma, an incurable blood cancer which damages the immune system. The Covid vaccines mobilize a healthy immune system to fight the virus. If your immune system is not healthy, it will not respond effectively to fight the virus.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7873734/
But weren’t we told to get the vax to protect the immune compromised and vulnerable? Weren’t we also told those who are immune compromised to get the vax to prevent them from getting covid? Getting the vax neither prevents you from spreading nor getting COVID. The vax has failed miserably on every level.
If you changed the word “prevent” to the phrase “reduce the risk of” I would agree with your comment. The initial drug trials for the Pfizer vaccine indicated a 95% efficacy, not 100%.
Read the description of the approval of Comirnaty or what is written on the vial insert. For the prevention of COVID-19 not for the reduction of contracting COVID-19 nor the reduction of symptoms nor lowering the risk of hospitalization. Also, the efficacy of 95% has proven to be an absolute stretching of the truth as well because the time frame was never spoken about because everyone was assuming it was like a traditional vaccine which was extremely long lasting which it isnt.
There are many vaccines that require booster shots:
https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/vaccine-booster-shots
Most vaccines do not convey lifetime immunity. For example, if you plan to travel to Israel, which is hardly a third-world country with regard to its sanitation and health system, fifteen different vaccinations (”boosters”) are either recommended or required:
https://www.passporthealthusa.com/destination-advice/israel/
I would seek the advice of a trusted personal physician, and not blindly follow the claims of a PSA or the blog of unknown internet doctor. I don’t favor *government* Covid vaccine mandates; each of us should be allowed to make the decision to receive or refuse the vaccine based on individual risk-benefit assessment. I also believe that private entities, including employers and businesses, should be allowed to make their own rules regarding the vaccination staus of their employees and customers.
There is a big difference between requiring vaccinations for new hires and changing the rules in the middle of the game for existing employees.
The second is a blatant Nuremberg Code violation, attempting to use duress to influence medical treatment.
“There is a big difference between requiring vaccinations for new hires and changing the rules in the middle of the game for existing employees.”
Although I agree with this as an ethical or “best-practice” rule, for better or worse most employment arrangements are legally “at will” so the employer can change the rules governing wages, hours, and working conditions subject only to restrictions codified in state or federal law or union contracts. Twice during my career I was subject to mandatory unpaid furloughs, which were equivalent to a salary cut, because of declining revenue. There was no legal recourse; I could either accept the furlough or quit.
“The second is a blatant Nuremberg Code violation, attempting to use duress to influence medical treatment.”
https://fullfact.org/health/nuremberg-code-covid/
Your link dances around the topic.
At the end of the day I expect there will be Nuremberg 2.0 and the defense attorneys will use all those arguments—and then watch their clients shot by firing squads.
The victims of these vaccines will not be impressed by the “legal” arguments.
These COVID 19 "vaccines" don't even convey immunity for months. If only we were talking about years so your comparison is totally invalid.
Ironically, myeloma is also a vax side effect they are finding...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.