[Svartalfiar]

The problem with alternate treatments is it requires a tremendously expensive procedure—clinical trials—to get them approved for use. To get the financing you will need an organized effort and that could open up the door to people taking the money to their offshore banks.

Do you even read what you write when you write it?

The problem with fancy new treatments is that they require a tremendously even more expensive procedure - research, development, clinical trials, etc - to get them designed, created, safe, AND approved for use. To get the financing, well, usually it takes several years just for that step. And just as much (likely more) is gonna go to those same people with those same offshore bank accounts.

The difference here is that existing treatments have already completed all those RnD steps, already have a lot of safety knowledge, long-term studies, the only thing left is to test efficacy against the specific new disease you're trialing them on, and maybe safety factors if the dosages are higher than already established safe doses.

The ONLY REASONS your new 'vaccines' were so fast is because of a massive, unConstitutional government funding push, a complete bumrush on clinical trials (skipping/combining phases, etc) and complete blackout on alternate treatments.

[Svartalfiar]

And, I forgot to add -

Pharma has very little financial exposure here - Most of the $$ they’d be risking if they got shut down here would be almost entirely Federal dollars, not their own. They’ve already profited off this, even if every single ‘vaccine’ got pulled tomorrow.

Also, you said clinical trials of existing drugs would be very expensive. Why would all the unConstitutional funding that went to the ‘vaccines’ not also be applied to that? Are you arguing Gov should have funding for the ‘vaccines’ but not funded any other research? Why?